Best Practices for Online Education & Instruction
The following essay was written after reviewing peer-recommended resources over online learning and instruction.
There were many great ideas and suggestions in these readings over Best Practices in online education/instruction, as well as many common denominators as to what most consider to be ‘best practices’ for online learning and instruction. Much of what was contained in these readings was right on the money, in my opinion, but I would add that reading about these issues was far more powerful for me personally after having taken several courses online and seeing firsthand the types of successes and pitfalls that seem to be common among them.
One point that I found particularly salient was that the success of an online course lies in how technological tools will be used to achieve a quality product (coursework), as opposed to simply putting those tools in place. In the ‘Implementing Best Practices’ article, the author revealed that many institutions have found it challenging to achieve faculty use of e-learning technology that “truly enhances the learning interaction between faculty and students” (7), as opposed to simply posting materials online. I find this to be incredibly true, as I have personally seen and experienced both. Simply knowing how to put the tools in place does not necessarily make for an effective lesson. For example, a link to an automatic code generator does not serve much purpose if the course requires students to manually write code. In order to engage their students, e-learning instructors need to be as aware of how they are using tools to enhance their material as they are of the material they are presenting.
The most common factors among all of the Best Practices literature I read seemed to generally include the following:
- Design an online course for maneuverability, clarity, accessibility, and flexibility
When designing an online course, it is best to establish curriculum, goals, and objectives first, then determine the ways in which an online environment might best serve the instructional objectives of that curriculum. In fact, as an added bonus to this approach, instructors have found that “in adapting their courses to online models, they are paying more attention to the instructional design of their courses. As a result, the quality, quantity, and patterns of communication students practice during learning are improved.” (4) Paying attention to file sizes, particularly with regards to graphic images and video/audio clips, prevents pages and resources from taking too much time to download (for this reason it is often preferable to link a video rather than embed it). Course material should be presented logically, and many students find it helpful if it is also presented chronologically; this helps them better keep track of where they are in their coursework. It is also a good idea to have a plan for how to address missed deadlines, unplanned absences or illnesses, etc. by considering extended due dates for reduced credit, alternate assignments, or competency exams. Build every online course so that students are afforded the flexibility to “attend” at the times when their schedules allow (daytime, nighttime, weekends). - Provide a thorough explanation of everything
Explain thoroughly and clearly to students how to use the tools on the course site, where things are, how to download/upload things, how to post to the discussion board, and how to generally navigate the course site. Technology policies should be clearly communicated and contact information for the Helpdesk should be provided. Communication of very specific expectations about coursework and participation right from the outset will avoid confusion later. In addition, tell the students what they can expect. Be very clear as to how much time and effort will be required on a weekly basis to be successful in the course. And, because the written word does not always translate the same way in print, always be as clear and concise as possible in writing, whether communicating instructions or simply communicating with the student(s). - Instructor Presence, Vigilance, and Feedback
Be present at the course site to ensure that the students know you care about their questions and concerns and are generally available for mentoring. The best online faculty are, according to the Ten Best Practices article, “faculty who show their presence multiple times a week, and at best daily”. (8) Also, take time to remind students of what is coming up next and when assignments are due. Recent research suggests that “providing students instructions in how to self-regulate yielded stronger learning results”. (10) Check in frequently with students and provide both scheduled and unscheduled feedback. Instructor feedback is critically important to students participating in an asynchronous course in order to keep them feeling involved and that their contributions are of value. To this same end, always be looking for signs that a student may be struggling as you read over coursework and discussion board submissions. The Law Librarian article says that some students will implant a “cry for help” within the text of their discussion board postings or blogs, but may not ever come right out and ask the question (additionally, a student’s total absence from discussion board postings may also signify a need for help). The good instructor will take these hints as a cue to intervene and respond appropriately. - Model and exemplify behaviors and quality of work expected of students (including spelling & grammar!)
Convey yourself accurately in print and use good English, so that course material looks professional and you (the instructor) look educated and responsible. The course should look well-planned and it should be evident that the content has been proofread. Model civility for your students by writing courteously, by requesting things instead of demanding them, and by remembering to administer positive reinforcement. The instructor and the course itself should serve as examples of the courtesy expected of the students and the quality expected of their work. - Utilize lots of dialoguing and communications tools, especially the Discussion Board
According to the Instructional Strategies article, “discussion is the instructional strategy most favored by adult learners because it is interactive and encourages active, participatory learning“ and is often “the heart of an online course”. (4) Asynchronous discussion boards are available on most course sites such as Blackboard, and synchronous (real-time) discussion can be offered by utilizing chat rooms or virtual reality environments (such as Second Life). A great point about discussion boards made on the Law Librarian site explained that some online instructors grade students’ participation by counting the number of posts made to a discussion board – but when quantity is what counts, it quickly replaces quality. As the article states, “A quantitative basis for grading may be appealing to teachers when compared with the demands of using judgment and applying standards of quality to student work…however, successful programs don’t succumb to the path of least resistance, and instead use technological tools to enhance the quality of learning and participation.” (6) I thought this was a great point because I can remember thinking to myself several times during various courses that the discussion board postings seemed more like a way to meet a quota than a way to discuss learning. - Course should be as dynamic as possible (rich content) and visually appealing
Make the course as dynamic as possibly by building it so that discussions and links to current events/resources are included in the course material. A rich environment will keep the student motivated and interested. Additionally, online courses should be attractive and graphically appealing. Researchers at the University of British Columbia found that “how a course looks can be just as important as the lessons themselves”. (1) Avoid too much text without a break, vary activities, and use plenty of graphics and interactive/multimedia elements to keep students visually and mentally engaged. - Use a lot of variety, both in presentation and teaching approaches
Maintain a fresh, interesting, and effective learning environment by utilizing lots of variety – use a variety of large group, small group, and individual work experiences; use both synchronous and asynchronous activities; combine core concept learning with customized/personalized learning. Present material in such a way as to be compatible with a number of learning styles. And since effectively learning concepts involves recognition of patterns and relationships, individual fact-memorization, vocabulary, and “busy-work”, or work given for the primary purpose of earning a grade, should be strictly avoided.
In summary, online learning has facilitated a shift from an instructor-based approach (whereby the instructor is the primary source of information) to a learner-based approach (whereby the learner takes control of her/his own learning experience). In other words, the goal of online learning is the student’s engagement with the material, rather than the student’s “engagement with the teacher as the vessel where the knowledge resides.” (6) In this way, the instructor ceases to be the only instrument in the virtual classroom, playing solo, and instead becomes the conductor of an orchestra, playing in harmony with the students in a reciprocal, interactive learning experience.
- http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/online/web-elem.htm
- http://www.onlineteachingtips.org/
- http://www.facultyfocus.com/free-report/principles-of-effective-online-teaching-best-practices-in-distance-education/
- http://www.ion.illinois.edu/resources/tutorials/pedagogy/instructionalstrategies.asp
- http://www.sjc.cc.nm.us/pages/2825.asp
- http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2008/08/best-practices.html
- http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm05312.pdf
- http://www.designingforlearning.info/services/writing/ecoach/tenbest.html
- http://www.schoolofed.nova.edu/afso/pdf/best_practices_OL.pdf
- http://www.umassonlineblog.com/2009/08/07/best-practices-in-online-learning/
- http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/52/108
- http://www.sanjuancollege.edu/pages/2823.asp
- http://www.techlearning.com/
- http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2QXK6R503xoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA130&dq=best+practices+in+teaching+online+religion&ots=Y6SxRY7uZV&sig=P7_9ErhuA7sStmgEjgGAZ9WAhXM#v=onepage&q=&f=false
- http://www.onlinelearning.net/index.html?s=120.1050g395o.0483225k40
Constructivist Learning Theory and the 5 E’s
The research I did for this essay was very exciting for me because I have thought about all of these concepts myself at one time or another, and it was a great discovery to realize that not only were my thoughts valid, but that there is actually a name for this type of learning. I have always believed that rote memorization and the passive learning only of “what we know” has been a flawed method of teaching. I think this because I experience much greater understanding of concepts or subjects when A) I realize that the same principles that govern them also govern other concepts & subjects as well, and B) I realize that there is room for outgrowth from this initial knowledge (i.e., the knowledge being imparted is not finite). In this way, I have used those governing principles to figure things out that I did not previously know. For example, after using a couple of different Microsoft programs, I realized that many of the hotkey commands were the same across multiple applications (like CTRL-z for Undo and CTRL-v for Paste). Once I realized this, I began to use those hotkey commands in all Microsoft applications, and they worked, even though no one had taught me to use those commands for those specific applications. And then I used them with other, non-Microsoft applications, and some of those worked too.
This premise is the basis of Constructivist Theory and Inquiry-Based Learning. I think this theory of learning is summed up best in the Concept to Classroom article: [Constructivism is to] “think of knowledge not as inert factoids to be memorized, but as a dynamic, ever-changing view of the world we live in and the ability to successfully stretch and explore that view.” (2) Learning by this approach, students are not just digesting information, but manipulating the information, relating it to their prior experiences and knowledge, and drawing new conclusions based on a combination of the existing and the new knowledge. In this way, “this previous knowledge is the raw material for the new knowledge [the student] will create”. (2) This approach to teaching, in my opinion, is far more effective than simply learning through the repetition of a fixed set of facts. Students tend to forget rote facts as soon as they don’t have to remember them anymore (i.e., when the course is over or they progress to the next grade level), and I believe that this is because there is nothing with which to connect those rote facts to give them any personal meaning for the student. In the absence of personal meaning or a “parent” context in which to fit the information in one’s mind-maps, it becomes meaningless and forgettable. However, if the student understands the larger context of a set of facts, those facts will take on more personal meaning to them and thus will be remembered. In addition, since the facts have now been associated with other information, new conclusions can now be drawn using a combination of the old and new knowledge.
I can remember many, many times trying to explain to my son as he complained that he hated his biology class that he would love it if he only understood how that biology fit into the “bigger picture”. In fact I talk to my son about the “bigger picture” quite a bit, for these very reasons. Studying neural synapses by themselves would undoubtedly be boring for a young person; however, if you explained to that same student that those neural synapses were the key to understanding memory and intelligence, suddenly they take on an entirely different meaning.
Constructivism and Inquiry-based Learning are based in part on this idea of a “bigger picture”. Not only do neural matters impact intelligence, but biology therefore impacts sociology (due to humans’ behavior towards each other), and sociology impacts literature (because literature reflects society), and so forth. This cross-disciplinary approach allows the student to interrelate concepts across the (former) boundaries of discipline and grade level. In this manner, the student is not only learning, but she is learning how to learn.
A person who has learned how to learn will undoubtedly be more successful at life because of the ability to consistently absorb and process new information effectively. But more than that, it allows a person to be successful in today’s society and its abundance of new and/or available information. A person who has been taught using the traditional “linear” method of learning will have developed habits of mind that focus on fixed facts and static knowledge, habits which are highly ineffective in a world where facts are growing, not fixed, and knowledge is expanding, not static. As the Concept to Classroom article states, “Memorizing facts and information is not the most important skill in today's world. Facts change, and information is readily available -- what's needed is an understanding of how to get and make sense of the mass of data.” (3)
I could not agree more with this philosophy. As a person who has worked with data for over 7 years now, I can state unequivocally that the information is out there – the trick to making use of it is knowing where to get reliable data, how to interpret that data with respect to the topic at hand, and how to relate that data to previous knowledge or information in order to draw new conclusions. In other words, in today’s world, it is more important to know how to correlate and make sense of things than it is to know bare facts by themselves (or even as a set).
Our modern society is faster paced, globally networked, technologically oriented, and requires workers who can problem solve and think critically… Our schools must change their approach to education to produce students who can thrive in the modern world. (3)
What all of this really translates to, in my opinion, is Problem-Solving. I have watched a cashier at McDonald’s not be able to make change when the cash register display screen was broken. Whether or not this person had any knowledge of subtraction is unknown to me, but my guess would be that she did know at least a little bit of elementary math. What was missing was the ability to solve a problem. The girl had become so reliant on the little screen to tell her the correct amount of change that it did not even occur to her that she could figure it out herself. This, in my view, is the primary problem with the educational system in this country. Students are not taught how to apply things, how to relate them to other things, how to interpret what they see or draw conclusions based on what they already know. They are not taught how to problem-solve.
I attended a Gifted & Talented school for elementary and junior high schools, and I remember doing this one exercise that I hated (but now that I have this knowledge about Inquiry-based learning, I understand completely why we were made to do it). A special teacher would come in to our classroom once a week and we would have “Problem-Solving” time. We would be split off into groups of four, given a large-scale problem (like Pollution or something similar) and asked to “Brainstorm” all potential solutions or remedies that we could think of. Everyone in the group would then have to write down all their solutions on separate slips of paper and throw them into the middle of the group’s table, until the group had a big pile of solutions. Then we would go through each solution one by one as a group, and talk about why we did or did not think that solution would work, until we settled as a group on one solution that made the most sense. We would then be asked to explain the reasoning behind our choice. I remember thinking that the exercise was so pointless (I was young, what can I say…) but now it makes perfect sense! Apparently my little Texan Gifted-and-Talented school was light years ahead of its time by making use of Constructivist Learning Theory and Inquiry-based learning in the early 1980’s, before it was widely accepted. Funny the things you wake up to when you get older.
Overall, I think that these concepts, and my feelings on the matter, can best be summed up by the following quote from an article on Inquiry-based Learning:
Content of disciplines is very important, but as a means to an end, not as an end in itself. The knowledge base for disciplines is constantly expanding and changing. No one can ever learn everything, but everyone can better develop their skills and nurture the inquiring attitudes necessary to continue the generation and examination of knowledge throughout their lives. For modern education, the skills and the ability to continue learning should be the most important outcomes. (3)
I couldn't agree more.
RESOURCES
- "Constructivism & the 5 E's." Miami Museum of Science. 2001. Miami Museum of Science. 20 Jun 2009
- "Constructivism as a Paradigm for Learning and Teaching." Concept to Classroom. 2004. Thirteen Ed Online. 20 Jun 2009
- "Inquiry-Based Learning." Concept to Classroom. 2004. Thirteen Ed Online. 20 Jun 2009